Qualcomm Unveils Even More Snapdragon X Elite PC CPU Benchmarks: 23W & 80W Reference Laptops Tested

Photo of author
Written By Editor

Who keeps posting articles without emotional mental changes

Qualcomm has actually offered a lot more standards of its upcoming Snapdragon X Elite PC CPU including the Oryon core architecture.

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite Showcases Strong Single & Multi-Core Performance In Latest Benchmarks: 23W Efficiency & 80W Performance Optimized Laptops Demoed

Following the preliminary reveal and criteria, Qualcomm provided an additional deep-dive of its next-gen Snapdragon X Elite CPU platforms which will be powering its fleet of Windows PCs in the following year. You can discover more information on the architecture side of things here.

Associated Story SK hynix Turbocharges Qualcomm's Snapdragon Gen 3 Mobile SOC With LPDDR5T DRAM, 16 GB Capacity Up To 9.6 Gbps

Throughout the hand-off discussion, Qualcomm had 2 referral laptop computers established for the audiences that included a 28W efficiency-focused design and an 80W high-performance variation. The thin & light setup was running a Snapdragon X Elite CPU with a 4.0 GHz (2-core) and 3.4 GHz (all-core) increase frequency while the performance-focused system was running the chip with a clock of 4.3 GHz (2-Core) and 3.8 GHz (All-Core) increase.

  • Laptop computer # 1 - Snapdragon X Elite CPU 80W/ 4.3-3.8 GHz Boost/ 16.5" Display/ LPDDR5x-8533
  • Laptop computer # 1 - Snapdragon X Elite CPU 28W/ 4.0-3.4 GHz Boost/ 14.5" Display/ LPDDR5x-8533

There are extra distinctions for both referral laptop computers with the 80W setup utilizing a 16.5" screen with an optimum resolution of 3840x2160 and a larger 87Wh battery while the 28W setup utilizes a 14.5" OLED screen with an optimum resolution of 2880x1800 and a 58Wh battery. Both designs included active cooling and were geared up with the current LPDDR5x-8533 system memory. The thinner laptop computer, as the name recommends, was simply 15mm thick while the 80W version had a density of 16.8 mm.


swiper-slide" data-src=" https://cdn.wccftech.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Qualcomm-Snapdragon-X-Elite-CPU-Benchmarks-_-Cinebench-2024-ST-1456x819.png "data-sub-html="" > qualcomm-snapdragon-x-elite-cpu-benchmarks -_- cinebench-2024-st

 qualcomm-snapdragon-x-elite-cpu-benchmarks -_- cinebench-2024-mt

 qualcomm-snapdragon-x-elite-cpu-benchmarks -_- geekbench-6-st

 qualcomm-snapdragon-x-elite-cpu-benchmarks -_- geekbench-6-mt

 qualcomm-snapdragon-x-elite-gpu-benchmarks -_- aztec-ruins-fps

 qualcomm-snapdragon-x-elite-gpu-benchmarks -_- 3dmark-wildlife-extreme

 qualcomm-snapdragon-x-elite-gpu-benchmarks -_- ul-ai 2 of 9 The efficiency of both chips was examined in numerous criteria such as

  • Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, 3DMark Wildlife Extreme, Aztec Ruins, and UL Procyon AI
  • . Both 28W and 80W CPU versions of the Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite series were checked versus a variety of chips from Apple, Intel,
  • and AMD. The rival outcomes are at their optimum possible efficiency utilizing unconstrained power limitations. The platforms consisted of: Intel- Core i7-13800H

    ( 14-Core CPU @ 115W) Razer Blade 15 2023 AMD -Ryzen 9 7940HS

    ( 8-Core APU @ 80W)
    ROG Zephtrus G14 2023 Apple
    ( 8/10C)
    MacBook Pro
    2022 The
    can be seen listed below: CPU Benchmarks( Cinebench 2024 ST) ST 0
    40 80 120 160
    40 80 120 160 200 240 Snapdragon X Elite( 80W )132 Snapdragon X Elite( 28W) 122 Apple M2( ~ 20W) 121 Core i7-13800H( 115W) 115 Ryzen 9 7940HS(
    80W) 109 CPU Benchmarks( Cinebench

    2024 MT) MT
    0 400 800 1200

    1600 2000 2400 0 400
    800 1200 1600

    2000 2400 Snapdragon X Elite( 80W
    ) 1220 Core i7-13800H(

    115W) 996 Ryzen 9 7940HS( 80W
    ) 979 Snapdragon X Elite( 28W)
    950 Apple M2( ~ 20W
    In Cinebench 2024,

    the Snapdragon X Elite CPUwith
    its Oryon core architecture is stated to
    provide to 20% greater single-core and two times the multi-threaded efficiency of the competitors. Doing a breakdown, the80W chip is 9%
    faster than the Apple M2, 15% faster than the i7-13800H
    , and 21% faster than the Ryzen 9 7940HS

    while the 28W X Elite CPU is 1%, 6%,

    12% faster than the very same

    chips, respectively. Taking a look at
    multi-threaded ratings, the

    X Elite 80W
    laptop computer is 22% faster than

    Intel, 25%

    faster than AMD, 28% faster than the 28W chip, and over 2x quicker than the Apple M2 CPU. The 28W setup is neck to neck with the much greater wattage Apple and Intel equivalents and 66 %faster than the Apple M2. CPU Benchmarks (Geekbench 6 ST) ST( Higher is Better) 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Snapdragon X Elite (80W )

    2940 Snapdragon X Elite (28W )

    2780 Core i7-13800H (115W)

    2755 Ryzen 9 7940HS (80W)

    2695 Apple M2( ~ 20W)< div class=" chart-item tooltip-chart" data-text =" ST (Higher is Better)
    2658." > 2658 CPU Benchmarks( Geekbench
    MT( Higher is
    Better) 0 4000 8000 12000 16000 20000 24000 0 4000 8000

    12000 16000 20000 24000 Snapdragon X Elite( 80W)< div class=" chart-item tooltip-chart" data-text=" MT( Higher is

    Better) 15130."

    15130 Core i7-13800H( 115W)< div class=" chart-item
    tooltip-chart" data-text=" MT( Higher is Better) 14342." >
    14342 Snapdragon X Elite( 28W)< div class=" chart-item tooltip-chart" data-text=" MT (Higher is Better) 14000

    14000 Ryzen 9 7940HS (80W)

    < div class=" chart-item tooltip-chart" data-text =" MT( Higher is

    Better) 12181." >
    12181 Apple M2 (~ 20W

    )< div class=" chart-item tooltip-chart" data-text="

    MT( Higher is
    Better) 10088." > 10088 In Geekbench, the

    lead depends on 10%
    in single-core and approximately 50% in multi-core efficiency tests. Breaking down
    the numbers, both X Elite CPUs maintain the
    greatest single-core

    efficiency out of the
    chips evaluated however

    the primary distinctions depend on the multi-core tests. The

    80W setup is

    as much as 5
    % faster than Intel, 8

    % faster than the 28W X
    Elite chip,

    24% faster than AMD, and 50% faster than Apple's service. GPU Benchmarks( Aztec Ruins) FPS 0 70 140 210 280 350 420 0 70 140 210 280 350 420 Snapdragon X Elite (80W) 350 Snapdragon X Elite( 28W) 295 Apple M2(
    ~ 20W) 295 Core i7-13800H( 115W) 177

    9 7940HS (80W)

    139 GPU Benchmarks 3DMark Wildlife

    FPS 0 8

    16 24 32 40 48 0 8 16 24 32 40 48 Snapdragon X Elite( 80W) 44.5 Apple M2 (~ 20W )40.8 Snapdragon X Elite( 28W )38.5 Ryzen 9 7940HS( 80W )28.9 Core i7-13800H (115W) 26.6 For the GPU standards, Qualcomm is promoting as much as 2.5 x and 67% gains in Aztec Ruins & 3DMark Wild Life Extreme standards, respectively. The Aztec Ruins standards support numerous APIs consisting of Vulkan, Metal, OpenGL ES 3.2, Desktop OpenGL, DirectX11

    , and DirectX12. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS is revealed to be slower than the

    13800H here
    which isn't the case inreal-life
    workloads and gamesWork The 3DMark Wildlife Extreme criteria is utilized when again to assess the
    performance and

    have the same reservations as the previous article

    as the performance

    showcased for the Ryzen 97940HS here
    is not up to mark and the chip should easily be much faster than the 13800H when actual games are mustQuickly
    That appears to be the case as the laptop computer was
    evaluated by Geekerwan in Control at 1440P and the CPU led to 32 FPS versus 30-33 FPS on the Ryzen 7 7840HS
    . This is an excellent display for the X Elite if it is handling to provide efficiency

    with AMD's RDNA 3 graphics architecture and we can't wait to see additional optimizations as the chipmaker still has a number of months to
    go till launch.< img decoding=" async" class =" size-full wp-image-1475081" src=" https://cdn.wccftech.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Qualcomm-Snapdragon-X-Elite-Gaming-Benchmark-Control-1440P.png" alt=""

    width=" 3840" height=" 2160" srcset
    =" https://cdn.wccftech.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Qualcomm-Snapdragon-X-Elite-Gaming-Benchmark-Control-1440P.png 3840w, https://cdn.wccftech.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Qualcomm-Snapdragon-X-Elite-Gaming-Benchmark-Control-1440P-564x317.png 564w

    https://cdn.wccftech.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Qualcomm-Snapdragon-X-Elite-Gaming-Benchmark-Control-1440P-728x410.png 728w, https://cdn.wccftech.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Qualcomm-Snapdragon-X-Elite-Gaming-Benchmark-Control-1440P-1456x819.png

    1456w, https://cdn.wccftech.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Qualcomm-Snapdragon-X-Elite-Gaming-Benchmark-Control-1440P-1920x1080.png 1920w" sizes="(
    max-width: 3840px)

    100vw, 3840px" >
    Lastly, we have the UL

    Procyon AI standard
    which examines the reasoning efficiency of CPU, GPU, and devoted neural engines. Apple

    is neglected of

    this standard while the X Elite CPUs are revealed to be over 10x faster than the competitors. AMD Ryzen CPUs include a devoted AI engine referred to as Ryzen AI and ought to show to be an opposition to the neural AI abilities on X Elite chips though the appropriate real-world application requires to be utilized. The Qualcomm X Elite CPUs with Oryon cores are prepared for launch by the middle of 2024 and the business will likewise be sharing more information in

    the future. By the time these chips do launch, Intel will have its Meteor Lake (1st Gen Core Ultra) and AMD will have its Strix Point( Ryzen 8000) CPUs out in the market so the competitors is going to be truly warmed in the customer area. News Sources: Anandtech, PC.Watch

    Categories PC

Leave a Comment