Qualcomm has actually offered a lot more standards of its upcoming Snapdragon X Elite PC CPU including the Oryon core architecture.
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite Showcases Strong Single & Multi-Core Performance In Latest Benchmarks: 23W Efficiency & 80W Performance Optimized Laptops Demoed
Following the preliminary reveal and criteria, Qualcomm provided an additional deep-dive of its next-gen Snapdragon X Elite CPU platforms which will be powering its fleet of Windows PCs in the following year. You can discover more information on the architecture side of things here.
Throughout the hand-off discussion, Qualcomm had 2 referral laptop computers established for the audiences that included a 28W efficiency-focused design and an 80W high-performance variation. The thin & light setup was running a Snapdragon X Elite CPU with a 4.0 GHz (2-core) and 3.4 GHz (all-core) increase frequency while the performance-focused system was running the chip with a clock of 4.3 GHz (2-Core) and 3.8 GHz (All-Core) increase.
- Laptop computer # 1 - Snapdragon X Elite CPU 80W/ 4.3-3.8 GHz Boost/ 16.5" Display/ LPDDR5x-8533
- Laptop computer # 1 - Snapdragon X Elite CPU 28W/ 4.0-3.4 GHz Boost/ 14.5" Display/ LPDDR5x-8533
There are extra distinctions for both referral laptop computers with the 80W setup utilizing a 16.5" screen with an optimum resolution of 3840x2160 and a larger 87Wh battery while the 28W setup utilizes a 14.5" OLED screen with an optimum resolution of 2880x1800 and a 58Wh battery. Both designs included active cooling and were geared up with the current LPDDR5x-8533 system memory. The thinner laptop computer, as the name recommends, was simply 15mm thick while the 80W version had a density of 16.8 mm.
< div class=" swiper-slide" data-src=" https://cdn.wccftech.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Qualcomm-Snapdragon-X-Elite-CPU-Benchmarks-_-Cinebench-2024-ST-1456x819.png "data-sub-html="" > ( 14-Core CPU @ 115W) Razer Blade 15 2023 AMD -Ryzen 9 7940HS faster than AMD, 28% faster than the 28W chip, and over 2x quicker than the Apple M2 CPU. The 28W setup is neck to neck with the much greater wattage Apple and Intel equivalents and 66 %faster than the Apple M2. CPU Benchmarks (Geekbench 6 ST) ST( Higher is Better) 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Snapdragon X Elite (80W ) 16 24 32 40 48 0 8 16 24 32 40 48 Snapdragon X Elite( 80W) 44.5 Apple M2 (~ 20W )40.8 Snapdragon X Elite( 28W )38.5 Ryzen 9 7940HS( 80W )28.9 Core i7-13800H (115W) 26.6 For the GPU standards, Qualcomm is promoting as much as 2.5 x and 67% gains in Aztec Ruins & 3DMark Wild Life Extreme standards, respectively. The Aztec Ruins standards support numerous APIs consisting of Vulkan, Metal, OpenGL ES 3.2, Desktop OpenGL, DirectX11 this standard while the X Elite CPUs are revealed to be over 10x faster than the competitors. AMD Ryzen CPUs include a devoted AI engine referred to as Ryzen AI and ought to show to be an opposition to the neural AI abilities on X Elite chips though the appropriate real-world application requires to be utilized. The Qualcomm X Elite CPUs with Oryon cores are prepared for launch by the middle of 2024 and the business will likewise be sharing more information in the future. By the time these chips do launch, Intel will have its Meteor Lake (1st Gen Core Ultra) and AMD will have its Strix Point( Ryzen 8000) CPUs out in the market so the competitors is going to be truly warmed in the customer area. News Sources: Anandtech, PC.Watch
2 of 9 The efficiency of both chips was examined in numerous criteria such as
( 8-Core APU @ 80W)
) 1220 Core i7-13800H(
) 979 Snapdragon X Elite( 28W)
multi-threaded ratings, the
."
Better) 10088." > 10088 In Geekbench, the
)
, and DirectX12. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS is revealed to be slower than the
That appears to be the case as the laptop computer was
on
width=" 3840" height=" 2160" srcset